context safety score
A score of 37/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
brand impersonation
Domain 29filmywap.com impersonates the well-known piracy brand 'Filmywap' (filmywap.com). The site presents itself as 'Filmywap (Official)' in the footer and uses Filmywap branding, logos, and SEO metadata to pass as the legitimate or official Filmywap site while operating on a numerically prefixed lookalike domain. (location: page.html:9-15, page.html:137, metadata.json:domain)
malicious redirect
The canonical URL tag redirects from 29filmywap.com to a different domain, 35filmywap.com. All content links, search forms, and navigation also point to 35filmywap.com rather than the current domain, indicating this page serves as a redirect funnel/doorway page designed to funnel traffic to another piracy site. (location: page.html:8 (canonical href=https://www.35filmywap.com/), page.html:107 (form action=https://www.35filmywap.com/mobile/search), page.html:112-114)
brand impersonation
The site falsely claims association with Netflix by listing 'Accused (2026) Netflix Bollywood Movie Download', implying Netflix content is available for free download, misleading users about Netflix's brand and authorization. (location: page.html:94, page-text.txt:23)
social engineering
The site uses urgency and legitimacy signals ('Trending', 'HD Quality Updated', 'Official', 'All right reserved') combined with SEO-optimized copy to build false trust and encourage users to download pirated content. A Telegram channel link is also promoted to draw users into an uncontrolled messaging environment. (location: page.html:81 (t.me/filmywapbollywood), page.html:94-105, page.html:137)
brand impersonation
Footer text claims '© Filmywap (Official) 2026 All right reserved', falsely asserting official status. The domain (29filmywap.com) is a typosquat/lookalike that capitalizes on the Filmywap brand name to attract users searching for the original site. (location: page.html:137)
hidden content
A large block of competing piracy site names (mp4moviez, 9kmovies, 9xmovies, desiremovies, downloadhub, filmymeet, filmyzilla, jalshamoviez, katmoviehd, movierulz, tamilmv) are embedded inside an <h4> tag with no visible styling context, appearing to be SEO keyword stuffing to capture search traffic for multiple piracy brands. (location: page.html:124-126)
social engineering
The site is only 59 days old but presents itself as an established, official, long-running platform ('one of the biggest movie websites of all time'), creating a false sense of legitimacy and longevity to gain user trust. (location: .brin-context.md:8, page.html:86)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/29filmywap.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
29filmywap.com currently scores 37/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.