context safety score
A score of 45/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
brand impersonation
The site categorizes and lists content under brand names Netflix, Disney+ Hotstar, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, HBO Max, Crunchyroll, and others as navigation categories and streaming provider labels, implying affiliation or official partnership with these platforms while operating as an unauthorized piracy site. This constitutes systematic brand impersonation of major streaming services. (location: page.html lines 154, 170-177, 622, 1143; navigation menu and sidebar category widgets)
social engineering
The site uses fabricated user reviews (fake testimonials attributed to 'คุณนนท์, กรุงเทพมหานคร' and 'คุณมิ้น, เชียงใหม่') to build false trust and legitimacy, encouraging users to visit and use what is an unauthorized content distribution site. The reviews are embedded in the footer and promote free, no-registration streaming of copyrighted content. (location: page.html lines 1244-1245; page-text.txt lines 1124-1126)
hidden content
The page explicitly declares a block of SEO keyword stuffing in the visible page text, labeled 'คีย์เวิร์ด SEO สำคัญที่ครอบคลุมในบทความนี้' (Important SEO keywords covered in this article), listing numerous keyword variants designed to manipulate search engine rankings. This content is rendered in very low-contrast dark grey (#d4d4d4) text on a dark background, making it nearly invisible to human readers while remaining machine-readable for crawlers and AI agents. (location: page.html lines 1239-1242; page-text.txt lines 1120-1123)
hidden content
A CSS block is declared with the comment '/* CSS สำหรับตัวเล่นปลอม */' (CSS for fake player), referencing a 'fake-player-container' class. This indicates the presence of a fake video player UI element, which is a common technique on piracy and malvertising sites to deceive users into clicking play buttons that trigger ad redirects or malicious downloads rather than playing legitimate content. (location: page.html lines 92-95, style id='fake-player-custom-css')
malicious redirect
The navigation menu includes an outbound link to an external domain 'https://one-series.com/' styled identically to internal navigation links, with no nofollow attribute or visual distinction. This cross-promotion to a sister piracy site via menu navigation can redirect users to additional unauthorized content platforms, and is a common technique in piracy site networks to funnel traffic between affiliated domains. (location: page.html line 156; page-text.txt line 42)
brand impersonation
The site's CSS ID is named 'fake-player-custom-css' with an explicit comment about a 'fake player', and the site presents streaming content with quality labels (4K, 4K-HDR, FHD, UHD) that mimic legitimate streaming platform presentation. The overall site design mimics legitimate streaming services to deceive users into believing they are accessing authorized content from Netflix, Disney+, and other platforms. (location: page.html lines 92-95, movie listing sections throughout)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/25-hd.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
25-hd.com currently scores 45/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.