Is 2385992079.hydr0.org safe?

cautionmedium confidence
58/100

context safety score

A score of 58/100 indicates minor risk signals were detected. The entity may be legitimate but has characteristics that warrant attention.

identity
82
behavior
80
content
37
graph
70

5 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

malicious redirect

The page is served from subdomain 2385992079.hydr0.org but all canonical tags, og:url, CSS, JS, images, and internal links point to mp3.cc. The actual serving domain (hydr0.org) is completely different from the branded domain (MP3.cc), indicating the hydr0.org subdomain acts as an unauthorized mirror or redirect proxy for the legitimate MP3.cc site. (location: page.html:9 - canonical href='https://mp3.cc/', og:url='https://mp3.cc/', while served from 2385992079.hydr0.org)

high

brand impersonation

The page fully replicates the MP3.cc brand identity — logo, title 'Most popular songs | Download mp3 free, listen music online - MP3.cc', site name meta tag, and all visual assets — while being hosted on the unrelated domain hydr0.org. This constitutes brand impersonation of the legitimate MP3.cc service. (location: page.html:5,11 - title and og:site_name both reference MP3.cc while served from hydr0.org)

medium

malicious redirect

All MP3 audio file download/play URLs route through fine.sunproxy.net, a third-party proxy domain, rather than directly from mp3.cc. The base64-encoded path segments in these URLs (12 suspicious base64 blobs flagged in Tier 2) obfuscate the actual file routing and could facilitate traffic interception, analytics harvesting, or payload substitution. (location: page.html:228,247,266 - data-url and href attributes pointing to fine.sunproxy.net/file/<base64-encoded-path>)

low

hidden content

A section labeled 'Other listen' contains a dense block of unseparated song/artist keyword strings not presented in normal list format. This appears to be SEO keyword stuffing hidden within a low-visibility widget section, used to manipulate search engine indexing. (location: page-text.txt:1098-1101 - 'Other listen' block with run-on keyword string)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/2385992079.hydr0.org

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is 2385992079.hydr0.org safe for AI agents to use?

2385992079.hydr0.org currently scores 58/100 with a caution verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 25, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.